Just this month, I am proud to say we hit another major milestone that reflects as much on the entire digital video industry, as it does on Verimatrix. We celebrated reaching 500+ pay-TV operator customers and securing more than 20 million screens. (For additional milestones, read about our global number one ranking in Content Protection/DRM in MRG’s IPTV Market Leader report – for 5 1/2 consecutive  years!)

A large part of our tremendous growth has been due to the pay-TV planets colliding. Back in 2006, virtually all of our customers were delivering green field IPTV services over managed networks. Fast forward six years, our heritage in IP-based security techniques has placed Verimatrix in the center of this collision.

Cable and satellite providers are taking advantage of IP networks for two-way communication – over both managed and unmanaged (OTT) networks.  IPTV operators are also turning to Internet-based OTT video to enable a compelling multi-screen experience. And we are finding that increasingly even “pure play” OTT video providers need to meet the same content security requirements for premium video as the traditional operators do (see our latest white paper, Content Security Requirements for Multi-Screen Video Services.) Of course, there remain tens of thousands of analog operators that are still transitioning to digital (India’s Phase I digitization this year presents a wealth of opportunities.)

Our cable and satellite (DVB) customer base increased 100% in 2011, and we’ve had a 500% growth in secure OTT video services. Based on feedback from customers, particularly our DVB customers, they feel more confident that our VCAS solutions will help them extend into multi-network, multi-screen video services more efficiently.

Additional proof of our position in the market can be found in our 3-Dimensional Security approach, which we introduced more than three years ago: Flexible layers of protection techniques that address evolving business needs and revenue threats. In other words, any screen over any network to meet any threat. This clearly still rings true today.

Since celebrating this milestone was so much fun, everyone is focused on reaching the next one!

How can we provide our customers with the most innovative solutions for securing and enhancing revenue for multi-network digital TV services on the market today?

This month, Verimatrix has been recognized for our innovation by two separate entities, both distinguished in their own right.

During CES 2012, our MultiRights solution won the Content Protection category at the prestigious 2012 TV Innovation Awards.  Very exciting news, especially considering the source of the award.  Now in its third year and administered by IMS Research, the 2012 TV Innovation Awards are one of the premier endorsements of innovation in television. The awards recognize the most forward-thinking companies that are creating products and services to change the way people watch television.  We are thrilled that Verimatrix was honored as one of these companies.

We feel that this commitment to innovation has also contributed to our sustained market leadership in software-based security. In December, MRG released its bi-annual IPTV Market Leaders Report that named Verimatrix in the top position. This marks the 11th consecutive time that we have maintained our market share in IPTV, representing 5 ½ years of Verimatrix global leadership.

Not a bad way to ring in the New Year!  We are thrilled to kick off 2012 on such a high note and look forward to continuing our relentless innovation in multi-network and multi-screen content protection and revenue security. Our philosophy is that if we offer our customers innovative solutions for securing and enhancing revenue on their multi-network digital TV services, we help them to market leadership positions in their own business. Their success becomes our success.

On his Copyright and Technology blog, he describes the objective of this paper as an effort “to gather actual security requirements from major content owners and describe them in a single document. The intent is to help pay-TV operators and other video service providers that are looking to launch multi-screen video services, so that they know what to expect and avoid any unpleasant surprises with regard to security requirements when licensing content to offer through their services.”

Bill summarizes one of the major findings while developing these content security guidelines. “Life for pay-TV operators used to be relatively simple: adopt a conditional access (CA) technology that was equally effective in thwarting signal theft as it was in thwarting content piracy. Economic and security goals were aligned between operators and copyright owners.  Now life is considerably more complicated, as operators have to support home networks and branch out into mobile services. Content security requirements are more complicated as well.”

Click here to read the entire post from Bill’s Copyright and Technology blog. Download the paper and let us know if you agree with the content security guidelines for multi-screen video services.

To help navigate this landscape and to better serve our customers and the market, we helped develop a paper that will serve as a content licensing and security guide for video service providers planning multi-network, multi-screen services. We teamed with Bill Rosenblatt, founder of GiantSteps Media Technology Strategies, who has been steeped in digital rights and content management technologies for many years and has served as technical expert in litigation and public policy initiatives related to digital copyright.

Basically, he has the studio relationships, technical and legal chops and objective perspective to summarize available information and draw conclusions that are valuable to service providers.

We believe this is the most comprehensive guide available today on how the approach to multi-screen and TV Everywhere types of services relate to traditional licensing and security rules. In general, we found that practical security requirements for over-the-top (OTT) services and portable devices are becoming more analogous to traditional video delivery as the industry matures, meaning the requirements are becoming more stringent.

It is HD content, delivered to any device, that has become primary benchmark in licensing terms and security requirements. The physical media delivery regime for HD was fundamentally grounded in the AACS protection model – now the application of similar principles and in the digital delivery domain is part of the background, although we are seeing trends that this is changing.

In fact, the content of this first version of the paper highlights areas – licensing attributes, new security techniques, release windows, usage rules and studio policies – that are most in flux and provides signposts on where requirements are headed. Of course, market dynamics will never stop shifting. Content owners will attempt to influence them through their licensing deals, and content protection requirements are among the most important licensing terms.  When appropriate, we will update our conclusions over time and use future versions of the paper as a vehicle for updates and elaborations as the industry evolves.

Whether you are a traditional managed-network operator, an OTT video startup, or an ecosystem partner developing devices and apps for premium video delivery, this paper is a must-read to gain a better understanding of content and revenue security in the changing world of multi-screen services.

If you are facing some of these choices in launching new breeds of services, please take a minute to download this paper and let us know what you think. We look forward to continuing this discussion!

At this point, it seems we should move beyond the enabling regulations and technical obstacles surrounding premium VoD¹ and instead concern ourselves with market dynamics – who might be the big winners and losers.

Despite some changing dynamics in content licensing and security (see the new Verimatrix white paper on this topic), technology is not the long pole in the tent any more, but rather licensing terms and subscriber adoption – at least for early adopters. And we are clearly still in the experimental phase of verifying if a home theater movie experience in a similar release window as theatrical release provides a viable business upside.

There are still a significant number of unknowns, but continued experiments provide some interesting insights.

Consider, for example, that DirecTV, an early adopter of premium VOD, brought an Adam Sandler movie to their Home Premiere service in April as part of an agreement with Sony (This was part of a bigger deal with other major studios. See table below for details). The movie was released without much advertisement, eight weeks after theatrical release and with a price tag of $30. For a period of two weeks, subscribers could rent it and have 48 hours to watch it.  Apparently that VOD offer did not find a lot of takers, which many, including DirecTV CEO Michael White, attributed to the $30 price point.

Comcast planned to release the movie Tower Heist at the end of November but pulled it back due to theater owners’ protests. It’s tough to say why theater owners chose to protest this specific offering. It could have been the smaller release window of only three weeks, the holiday timing, or the fact that it was a bigger production. With a hefty proposed $60 price tag, though, VOD viewership would likely have been kept to relatively modest levels.

Time Warner Cable started offering smaller productions like Margin Call the same day of theatrical release for $6.99, and the VOD release did not seem to have limited the notable success in theaters. In the case of Melancholia, the movie was released even before the theatrical release to be consumed at home for $9.99.

The following chart summarizes some of the action so far:

So there has definitely been progress in the last few months, but additional experiments around this model are likely going to be visible before everyone places bets on the final outcome or the winning formula.  Strategies concerned with striking the right balance seem to vary between studios and that is expected when creating a completely new release window in a competitive marketplace. While the experiments come from different angles, it will be interesting to observe how the result will shake out.

In my opinion, here’s what needs to happen before we can move beyond “experimental” to “established” business models for ERW:

• Operators need to combine a compelling value proposition and a significant marketing campaign. This could involve increased advertising or bundling with physical media/digital copy strategies. The average consumer needs to be aware of the potential for a choice and to get accustomed to this option.
• Content owners should work towards identification of the scenarios where the ERW and theatrical window releases will complement each other, and drive an increase market penetration as a whole rather than being seen as competing with one another. Finding the sweet spot of the release timing, pricing and marketing effort will be part of that.
• It’s going to take a certain amount of patience for the studios, theater owners, content creators and certainly consumers to get comfortable with the new business model and equipment restrictions that support the delivery.

Would you pay for an early release movie to watch in your home (what Ben Schwarz calls “expensive VoD”)? What do you feel is the right formula for studios to make this successful?

I plan on continuing to follow the developments of premium VoD throughout 2012 – stay tuned!

¹ also called Home Theater or Home Premiere

As part of its Awards coverage, Digital TV Europe asked Tom to reflect on his accomplishments in 2011, and provide his vision for 2012. Here is an excerpt of the interview.

1. What for you were the professional highlights of the last year?

We delivered a number of multi-network, multi-screen projects to our customers, and we completed the acquisition of an excellent technology company (Comvenient, a DVB conditional access specialist based in Munich). Plus, our company passed an important milestone as we added our 500th operator customer.

2. What was the year’s most significant wider industry development in your opinion?

The embrace of multi-screen delivery by pay-TV operators.  It’s hard to believe that the iPad was launched less than two years ago, when it seems that every pay-TV operator is now racing to support tablets along with mobile phones, Blu-ray players and connected TVs.

3. What are your goals for next year?

The complexity of multi-network, multi-screen systems poses a huge challenge for pay-TV operators. We have a great solution to abstract away much of the complexity and related cost. In 2012, our plan is to take a leading market position for these rollouts.

4. What do you think are the main challenges and opportunities facing the industry over the next year?

Challenges are global economic concerns and the complexity of multi-screen systems. Opportunities are the half-completed transition from analog to digital networks, and the fact that pay-TV will be ascendant as the legacy advertising model erodes.

5. What would have been your career of choice if you had not worked in the digital TV/media industry?

There are other industries?  I’m very intrigued by biotech and the medical advances that are being driven by an aging population and new genetic advances.

6. Which individual in the public eye do you most admire and why?

Well, I certainly appreciate the unique entrepreneurial spirit of Steve Jobs.  To start a business in the garage and make it the most valuable company in the world, to return from exile, create a powerful culture and brand – that’s quite a life story.

#1.  Our CEO, Tom Munro, was shortlisted in the Technology Leader category for his contributions to the pay-TV industry as a whole.

#2.  Mario Pino, Marketing Launch Director for our customer Etisalat, was shortlisted in the Marketer of the Year category.

We are enormously gratified to receive this recognition; 2011 has been an incredibly productive and successful year on many fronts for us here at Verimatrix.  As our CEO, Tom is the visionary responsible for Verimatrix’s technical and commercial momentum in multi-network revenue security.  With a growing list of multi-screen deployments around the globe, this momentum is hard to ignore.

And we would also like to extend our sincerest congratulations to Mario.  It is an honor to be recognized alongside a partner, especially one as hard-working and innovative as Mario.  It’s Mario’s job to ensure that Etisalat lives up to its marketing message of ‘Get ready to be amazed’. Since Etisalat developed its vision as a leader in digital media delivery network over any network, any screen, at any time, the progress has been exponential.

In 2011 alone Mario played an instrumental role in launching the IPTV 2.0 service called eLife TV, Etisalat xGames, as well eLife OnWeb and eLife OnDemand on LG Smart TVs and LG Smart Upgraders. More information about these deployments can be found on Mario’s blog. He has achieved many accomplishments this year, and we wish him continued success in 2012.

Congratulations, Tom and Mario!

We laid out our product roadmap to show how we are meeting the needs of both our DVB and IPTV customers that are broadening their services to hybrid DVB-IP and multi-screen delivery. We haven’t received an RFP in the last 12 months that didn’t include some multi-network, multi-screen component. Even if customers are not ready to make that type of network transition now, they certainly want to understand their future options.

The Summit also provided a valuable forum to exchange views with experts and industry peers on the state of revenue security, potential threats and the piracy scene, and what’s next in the pay-TV marketplace.

We brought in two guest speakers to provide a broader view: Alan Constant and Steve Bjuvgard of Imediaco, a firm that provides technical and strategic consulting services across the entire range of media distribution technologies with particular expertise in video security. Alan offered an insightful perspective on the next 10 years of pay TV, by examining the previous 10 years. His convergence prediction is that DTH will be initially replaced by some form of hybrid network and then OTT on unmanaged networks.

Steve dug deep into piracy issues with some regional case study examples. He deftly broke down the status of piracy, along with the regulatory and legal enforcement environments in Asia and the Middle East. For example, in some Middle Eastern countries, it is estimated that up to 40% of urban households accessing pay-TV signals are unauthorized – meaning non-paying users.

Fresh from IBC, I also had some reflections to share. The most obvious was the lack of 3D “noise” on the show floor when compared to 2010. We saw only modest advancements in the positioning and development of 3D solutions and services. The 3D hype was soundly replaced by multi-screen services – although definitions differ, it is clearly the evolution of network convergence and it is no longer considered “new and mysterious” as it has been in years past. And it is worth pointing out that the falling prices of DVB set-tops are opening new markets, particularly in emerging regions.

Of course, operators are making decisions on the best ways to secure assets on these different delivery networks. As a validation of the software-based security approach, we saw even the legacy smartcard providers announce their software-based, multi-screen solutions. Of course, the other piece to the multi-network, multi-screen puzzle is content rights, which we find are dragging out these next-generation implementations.

We are working on some ground-breaking research regarding content rights across different networks and devices, so stay tuned.

All in all, the attendees at the EMEA Autumn Summit were a very interesting and dynamic group, representing both technical and business disciplines, with very ambitious and advanced business plans.  The speakers shared the difficulties of combatting piracy, not only through technical means but also through judicial, commercial, and creative mechanisms.

Of course, fun was had by all during our “extracurricular activities,” such as the visit to the Erdinger brewery with an extended tour of its facilities, where we learned everything worth knowing about beer making, and the Oktoberfest event itself, which was a totally OTT event (pun intended).

We look forward to hosting more events in 2012. We would love to get your input on what you’d like to hear from Verimatrix. Leave a comment and let us know.

So what was the topic of this year’s biggest digital TV conference? Well, actually, I was disappointed because it was multi-screen or any screen or something along those lines. But why is it disappointing you ask? Because we have been promoting this concept for years! And specifically securing premium pay TV content to all screens that subscribers find useful. In reality, I am really quite pleased that the industry finally caught up with our innovative security approach.

Let me offer you my observation about at least one of the less obvious challenges related to delivering rich combinations of TV services to all these connected TVs and portable platforms.  The challenge is reproducing many aspects of the live TV experience in a scalable fashion. Therefore, we are firm believers that, as this market matures, Internet TV services will naturally need a combined solution for both on-demand and live consumption.

None of the critical adaptive bitrate streaming protocols out there, specifically Smooth Streaming and HTTP Live Streaming (HLS), have been defined in a way that makes it easy to support tens of thousands of concurrent subscribers watching a major live event such as the soccer World Cup in real time.

When compared to the well-honed DVB broadcast technologies, some of the key issues of practical concern, like managing semi-synchronized key changes and addressing revenue leakage through re-broadcasting of various kinds, are not yet developed to scale in a streaming environment.

Addressing these kinds of issues takes Internet TV to the commercial level necessary to truly reproduce the pay-TV service paradigm–and associated revenue models – with which we are all familiar. This is where our experience from the IPTV and DVB worlds comes in really handy; where content is distributed to millions of subscribers while managing device entitlement, device security and frequent real-time rights changes.

If this makes you wonder if your current or planned multi-screen service scales beyond just a proof of concept or a friendly trial, give us a call. We are happy to show you how our VCAS for Internet solves this problem without installing a large number of servers in your head-end.

And don’t forget to stop by an old-fashioned cheese farm while visiting Gouda.

Steve Christian was recently featured on the increasingly popular Pay OTT TV Blog from Tvinici, which was highlighted at IBC 2011. 

Content security is one of the most complex issues associated with OTT TV.

We have asked Steve Christian, VP Marketing at Verimatrix, to give us the DRM / Conditional Access perspective of OTT TV (Verimatrix provides software-based security solutions for service providers).

Steve, What do you think are the main reasons behind pay TV operators expanding into the Over-the-Top Space?

A key driver is to be able to cover the bases of additional screens in the home, which from a defensive perspective would gather eyeballs of competitive or niche services. From a more positive standpoint this raises the competitive bar for other pay-TV operators in the same franchise area or region. Another reason is to be able to expand the geographic reach of the operator’s service brand beyond the existing subscriber pool, potentially to a worldwide audience.

What are the greatest challenges associated with content protection in the pay-OTT space?

The greatest challenge is awareness of content protection issues at a high level, and the details of how this must be supported at fine grain level.

To read the complete Q&A, please visit the Pay OTT Blog.